FP6116_0.png

Priciest states for in-home health aides

In-home health care is the most popular form of long-term support for elderly Americans. Yet, many people aren't aware of the steep costs involved. Almost one-third of Americans estimate they’ll pay about $417 per month, while the national median cost of care is $3,861 per month for a home health aide.

According to Genworth's annual Cost of Care study, the monthly cost of a home health aide rose 1.25% since 2015. However, it’s worth taking a close look at options because there are wide cost discrepancies between cities — even within an expensive state. Bottom line: There are bargains to be found if clients live in the right place.

Click through to see the top 10 most expensive states for home health aides, ranked by median yearly cost. Costs are also broken down by region where applicable. -- Maddy Perkins
FP6116_1.png

Wisconsin

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Green Bay.
FP6116_2.png

Oregon

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Salem.
FP6116_3.png

New York

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Brooklyn.
FP6116_4.png

Montana

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Missoula or Great Falls, Montana's most expensive cities for home health aides.
FP6116_5.png

Iowa

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Ames.
FP6116_6.png

Vermont

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Burlington, Vermont's most expensive city for home health aides.
FP6116_7.png

South Dakota

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Sioux Falls.
FP_6116_Nebraska

Nebraska

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Lincoln, Nebraska's most expensive city for home health aides.
FP6116_9.png

Delaware

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Dover.
FP6116_10.png

Maine

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Bangor.
FP6116_11.png

District of Columbia

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in the Washington area.
FP6116_12.png

Colorado

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in the Greeley area.
FP6116_13.png

California

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Madera.
FP6116_14.png

Washington

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Bellingham.
FP6116_15.png

Rhode Island

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Providence, Rhode Island's most expensive city for home health aides.
FP6116_16.png

New Hampshire

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Manchester, New Hampshire's most expensive city for home health aides.
FP6116_17.png

Massachusetts

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Barnstable Town, Massachusetts' most expensive city for home health aides.
FP6116_18.png

Hawaii

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Honolulu.
FP6116_19.png

Minnesota

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Minneapolis, Minnesota's most expensive city for home health aides.
FP6116_20.png

Alaska

Clients seeking more affordable options may consider residing in Fairbanks.
FP6116_21.png

North Dakota

Clients trying to save should avoid residing in Bismarck, North Dakota's most expensive city for home health aides.
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING