Updated Monday, July 28, 2014 as of 4:21 AM ET
Blogs - Trial and Heirs
Whitney Houston's Family Doesn't Trust Daughter's Money Management Skills
Monday, October 15, 2012
Partner Insights

Whitney Houston’s mother, Cissy Houston, and sister-in-law, Marion Houston, filed a request in court to change the terms of Whitney Houston’s will.  They want to delay when Bobbi Kristina receives her inheritance in order to protect her.  

The will created a “testamentary trust” for Bobbi Kristina.  What is a testamentary trust?  It’s when a will calls for money to be held in trust for one or more beneficiaries, usually so they can receive money spaced out over time instead of all at once.  It’s far from perfect, as we discuss in this article, because a testamentary trust does not avoid probate, which can be expensive, messy and very public.

But that is not the biggest drawback to Whitney Houston’s will.  Her biggest mistake was failing to update her will, even after her divorce from Bobby Brown, to better protect Bobbi Kristina.  The will — signed on February 3, 1993 — provides that Bobbi Kristina will receive 10% of the estate when she turns age 21, another one-sixth at age 25, and the full balance at age 30.  Bobbi Kristina is the only heir, so whatever royalties and other assets the estate now has or will earn in the future pass on to her.

Clearly, Cissy and Marion don’t believe she can handle it.  They recently filed a “Petition to Reform Testamentary Trust” claiming that the distributions to Bobbi Kristina “would likely directly conflict with and cause the opposite of [Whitney's] intent to provide long-term financial security and protection for her child”.  The Petition points out that the trust will have valuable assets — estimated by some to be worth at least $20 million.  Of course, the actual worth will depend on future sales.

Cissy and Marion allege that Bobbi Kristina, who is now 19, is a “highly visible target for those who would exert undue influence over her inheritance and/or seek to benefit from [Bobbi Kristina's] resources and celebrity.”  They feel that Whitney couldn’t have known this when she signed the will back in 1993, and her true intent would be to make sure that Bobbi Kristina’s long-term maintenance and care were protected, as well as that of Bobbi Kristina’s future children.

While these concerns surely have some degree of merit, given that the will only calls for relatively smaller pay-outs in the next several years (10% at age 21 and one-sixth at age 25), it appears that Cissy and Marion are worried that Bobbi Kristina won’t be able to protect herself and this money even after she receives the bulk of it at age 30.   All celebrities with wealth are potential targets for unsavory types.  So, Whitney’s family members clearly do not trust that Bobbi Kristina can protect herself when she begins receiving money.

It is not clear how much protection Cissy and Marion feel she needs, because their Petition does not ask for a specific change to the trust.  Instead, they ask the court to change the distributions in a manner consistent with what Whitney would have wanted.

This is a great example of why everyone needs to update their wills and trust documents periodically.  As the Petition points out, Whitney’s financial and family circumstances in 1993 were far different from when she passed away earlier this year.  Whitney should have updated her documents to address these changes in the 20-years since she signed her will.

In fact, Whitney did sign one “codicil” (which is an amendment) to the will in April, 2000, but it only changed who would act as trustees, not the distribution schedule.  One has to wonder why she did not ever address when the money would be distributed, if her intent did change.

There is no guarantee that this Petition will work.  Whitney had almost 20 years to change the will if her intent changed and she easily could have changed the distribution schedule when she signed the codicil in 2000.  If her intent was to protect Bobbi Kristina beyond age 30, as Cissy and Marion believe, then Whitney should not have left it to chance.

That’s why your clients should be reminded to periodically review their documents with an experienced estate planning attorney.  They shouldn’t leave the future of their loved ones up to chance.

Danielle and Andy Mayoras, are co-authors of Trial & Heirs: Famous Fortune Fights!, husband-and-wife legacy expert attorneys, and hosts of the national television special, Trial & Heirs:  Protect Your Family Fortune! Click here to subscribe to The Trial & Heirs Update.  You can “like” them on Facebook and follow them on Twitter.

(1) Comment
Czytając wywiad spośrod Kaczyńskim, chwytałem się na tym, że istnieje to oferta intrygująca, że w przewodniej części istnieje jakąkolwiek propozycją aż do pogadania a podyskutowania" - wpisał Wiesław Władca na stronie taktyka.pl. "Nie ma w ogole Smoleńska (ani słowa!), nie posiada szlagu na antagonistyczne PiS wizy usa czwarta władza, nie padają oskarżenia wedle wykazu godności także według wykazu najcięższych wizy do usa oskarżeń, nie dysponuje nic zatrważającego o Niemczech oraz Rosji, nie ma przesadnego przerażania także zbytniego patosu" - odczytujemy w przyszłości.
Posted by misiek m | Tuesday, June 25 2013 at 10:10AM ET
Post a Comment
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
2014 Summer Reading List for Advisors

Current Issue

The July Issue is now online!


Industry Events

August 10, 2014 |

September 9, 2014 |

September 17, 2014 |

September 20, 2014 |

September 28, 2014 |

Already a subscriber? Log in here