Updated Wednesday, July 23, 2014 as of 3:58 PM ET
Blogs - Trial and Heirs
Telemundo Star's Estate Heads for Turmoil
Sunday, January 13, 2013
Print
Email
Reprints
Partner Insights

Jenni Rivera was a singer-songwriter, actress and Telemundo TV star who died tragically on Dec. 9 in a plane crash in Mexico. While well-known to fans of Latino music and Mexican TV, Rivera appeared poised to breakthrough to mainstream America due to a new TV show she was set to star in for ABC.

The 43-year old Rivera lived a turbulent life.  She had her first child at age 15 and then married the father.  They had two more children together, but it was a marriage of abuse and molestation.  After the divorce, Rivera’s first husband was convicted and sentenced to 30 years in jail for child molestation.

Rivera married twice more and had two more children from her second marriage.  Her third marriage, to professional baseball player Esteban Loaiza, also was ending.  The couple filed for divorce on October 1, 2012, citing irreconcilable differences.   There was a report that Rivera and her eldest daughter had been fighting because the daughter had an affair with Loaiza, but it’s a report that the daughter strenuously refuted.

Rivera’s Estate will likely be as rocky as her life was.  NBCLatino reported that Rivera left behind a “letter”, which set forth detailed instructions so that her sister, Rosie, would take over management of her various business and music interests, her assets, and even care of her two minor children (their father, Rivera’s second husband, died in 2009).  Reportedly, her interests are held in a company, Jenni Enterprises, which is valued at $25 million.

This report alone raises many questions.  First, can a letter be treated as a valid will?  Normally, a will is prepared by an experienced estate planning attorney and leaves no question of whether or not it is intended to be a will.  But when someone creates their own will, the legal formalities may not be met.  In many states, including California where Rivera resided, if there is clear and convincing evidence that the person intended the document to be a will when it was signed, then it will be accepted as a will even without the legal formalities.  So the reported letter may or may not qualify as a valid will, depending on how it was worded.

Second, there is the question of Rivera’s husband.  While they filed for divorce in October, the divorce had not yet been finalized when the plane crash occurred.  Normally, in a community property state like California, the spouse is entitled to one-half of the estate. Loaiza was still considered Rivera’s legal spouse, and a letter alone would not be enough to deprive him of his interest.  However, if Rivera and Loaiza had a valid prenuptial agreement or if he otherwise waived his interest in the estate, then he would not receive half.  Instead, his interest in the estate would be governed by whatever agreement was in place.

Third, did Rivera have a living trust?  Most people of her wealth would have a living trust.  This would be expected of Rivera, considering she worked with advisers to create a company to manage her affairs.  She likely had some formal estate planning documents in place.   This could impact the validity of the letter, as well as what rights Loaiza would have in the estate.

All of these are issues that may likely lead to conflict and fighting in court.  In fact, Rivera’s father already told a Mexican television network that the funeral was delayed due to “legal reasons”.  Rivera was not laid to rest until December 31, more than three weeks after the crash.  Normally, funeral arrangements could be addressed in a will or other legal document, but in the absence of that, her husband would have the legal right to bury her, even though they had separated.

There is also the matter of the expected wrongful death lawsuit that will surely come.  Already, Rivera’s make-up artist, who was also killed in the crash, started legal proceedings against the plane manufacturer, owner, operator, and others, to allow for an investigation into the accident.  Her estate initiated the court action for the purpose of seeking multimillion dollar judgments against all who were responsible for the crash.

In Rivera’s case, until an estate is opened and someone is appointed as the executor of her estate, no one will have the legal authority to pursue a lawsuit for Rivera’s heirs. Given the questions surrounding the validity of the letter, and the fact that a spouse normally has first priority to be named as executor in the absence of a valid will, it may take some time until a person is put in charge of her estate through probate court.

Comment
Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.
Post a Comment
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Lists
2014 Summer Reading List for Advisors

Current Issue

The July Issue is now online!


TWITTER
FACEBOOK
LINKEDIN

Industry Events

August 10, 2014 |

September 9, 2014 |

September 17, 2014 |

September 20, 2014 |

September 28, 2014 |

Already a subscriber? Log in here