To improve the income profile of their portfolios, more investors are willing to consider foreign equities and exchange-traded funds of such stocks that use a dividend screen, but with foreign indexes, that screen is not always the same.
“Dividends in Europe are much more important than they are in the U.S., so you can get some nice dividend yields,” says Allan Nichols, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. Often, however, what you can’t get from foreign companies is a long history of dividend increases.
While indexes in the U.S. that screen companies based on the number of consecutive years of dividend increases usually have a minimum requirement of 10 or even 20 years, comparable foreign benchmarks sometimes require as few as five years of payment hikes.
Nichols says that’s understandable because many overseas companies in industries known for increasingly generous payments were government owned until fairly recently. He cites the telecom industry as an example.
Back in 2006, if you were looking for an ETF that focused on foreign dividend-paying stocks, you had a choice of one. Today, there are more than 20, including single-country dividend portfolios.
But an advisor has to choose carefully, since these products have significant differences. Many have no requirement for a minimum number of annual dividend increases, a screen that potentially can reduce some of the volatility of the portfolio. “It means that companies have a little more staying power if they are able to pay a growing dividend,” says Alec Young, global equity strategist at S&P Capital IQ.
-
A vast majority of plan sponsors say that actively managed funds can beat the market, according to a new BlackRock survey. Research suggests otherwise.
September 12 -
Cerity Partners adds its own large RIA in New York, and Beacon Pointe acquires firms in Indiana, Washington State and New York.
September 12 -
Older Americans hold a higher allocation of stocks than they would like, according to the Center for Retirement Research. Researchers say that could be a positive, though not all advisors agree.
September 12 -
A limited federal tax credit, an above-the-line deduction for non-itemizers and restrictions on those of itemizers represent three of the biggest shifts under the new law.
September 11 -
Raymond James accuses the widower of an advisor of using data stored on his wife's company-issued computer to solicit clients for a rival firm.
September 11 -
Agentic AI in several forms took center stage as fintech executives made the case for their services at the first-ever AI-focused demo drop at Future Proof.
September 11