For the truly rich, artificial intelligence can't compete with human advisors in handling many of their needs, according to a report from
The
"Clients are increasingly using AI to explore their options, but when it comes to making investment decisions, they value judgement, context and accountability from a trusted wealth advisor," Barry O'Byrne, CEO of international wealth and premier banking at
It's the latest attempt to figure out how AI is upending the finance industry, as
READ MORE:
But age matters, and the next generation of the truly wealthy may be happier handing more to AI and relying less on humans, according to the
Professionals in the industry, where senior managers handling ultrahigh net worth clients can earn millions of dollars a year, are trying to figure out what exactly makes a human advisor irreplaceable by AI. That's as the list of AI products continues to grow. Anthropic's Claude, OpenAI's ChatGPT and Alphabet's Gemini already offer tools that allow users to model portfolios, optimize taxation and even explore possible philanthropic ventures.
At the same time, the bank's survey makes clear which human attributes are proving hardest to supplant with AI.
The "most valued advisor contributions" include applying judgment and validation, spotting mistakes in AI-generated data and providing a personalized interpretation of complex data, the bank said.
"Investors primarily use AI for analysis and research, strategy support, and to provide a second opinion on their ideas,"
Against that backdrop, McKinsey has suggested that AI's arrival will likely lead to the creation of an entirely new job class within wealth management.
Firms may increasingly need to rely on "specialists, behavioral data scientists, personalization architects, and human-in-the-loop oversight professionals" to monitor AI's output, according to Debasish Patnaik, a senior partner with McKinsey.










