Vanguard, T. Rowe Price, Schwab top 2023 J.D. Power DIY investor survey; Merrill Lynch and Wells Fargo remain at bottom

wall-street-bl112116

The global pandemic pushed digital-first and do-it-yourself investing to new heights. But younger investors caught up in the wave now find themselves at a crossroads, according to a new J.D. Power analysis.

The 2023 J.D. Power U.S. Self-Directed Investor Satisfaction Study released this week said that amidthe rise and fall of meme stocks and cryptocurrency volatility, young investors want financial guidance, with the majority are open to digital advice from their brokerage firms. 

However the study, now in its 21st year, found that few of these investors understand how technology manages their portfolio — and that lack of understanding could create hurdles for firms trying to establish long-term relationships with next gen and DIY investors.

Craig Martin, the executive managing director and head of wealth and lending intelligence at J.D. Power, said that with most trading fees now eliminated and consumers having more tools at their disposal, brokerage firms are challenged to demonstrate a value proposition that stands out from the crowd. 

He added that while digital or robo-advice present an ideal platform to provide value-added services that can help grow and develop higher value relationships over time, firms need to do a better job of explaining how that digital advice works, all while articulating a clear value proposition for investors. 

"Critical things actually need to take more of a customer centric focus. And what I mean by that is, a lot of what we see out there today emphasizes the technical details and the structural nature of what digital advice is. And what we're seeing is that, do people actually understand that? How do they engage?" Martin told Financial Planning. "What does the customer care about? Why would they want to do this? Why is it good for them? What's the basics of it? Not in a technical fashion … what's the value exchange? 

The study finds that 86% of Gen Z investors and 79% of millennial investors are interested in receiving robo-advice. Those numbers have gone up 5 percentage points and 3 percentage points, respectively, during the past three years as market conditions have become more challenging.

But just 22% of investors who currently use robo-advice offerings from their brokerage firm say they "completely understand" how the technology manages their portfolio. Scores decrease significantly when investors say they are unsure how the digital technology works in general.

Do-it-yourself also doesn't mean do it alone. The study found that self-directed investors are still looking for human support when it comes to onboarding, answering technical questions and resolving problems. 

Martin said human support also plays a significant role in providing transparency and trust in digital advice. Over the long term, he expects a model that strikes the right balance between human and robo will come out on top.

"When you have this blending of people with new technology that has real value to the customer … you can get something that's a little bit lower cost, but provides a lot greater value," he said. "We see that a lot of people even when they're more DIY types, they still like having the availability of advice and help and structure. So I anticipate we'll see more of that and more emphasis on how you bring people back into it, and provide insight and perspective, but more on an ad hoc basis."

J.D. Power spoke with 5,165 investors between October 2022 and January 2023 to compile the firms' 2023 satisfaction scores and rankings. Each of the investors said they make all their investment decisions without the counsel of a full-service dedicated financial advisor.

To get a "satisfaction index" for each wealth manager on a 1,000-point scale, J.D. Power used seven weighted factors: "trust; digital channels; the ability to manage wealth how and when I want; products and services; value for fees; people; and problem resolution."

To see this year's rankings for both DIY investors followed by the rankings for investors seeking guidance, scroll down our slideshows.

Wells Fargo (WellsTrade)

Wells Fargo V3 by Bloomberg News
2023 ranking: 11
2022 ranking: 11
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 660
2022 score: 653
2023 vs. 2022: 7

Merrill Edge

Merrill-Lynch-sign-Bloomberg-News
2023 ranking: 10
2022 ranking: 10
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 660
2022 score: 679
2023 vs. 2022: (16)

Stash

Stash-invest-logo.webp
2023 ranking: 9
2022 ranking: 6
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 685
2022 score: 718
2023 vs. 2022: (33)

J.P. Morgan Self Directed Investing

JPMorgan 2 by bloomberg
2023 ranking: 8
2022 ranking: 9
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 691
2022 score: 685
2023 vs. 2022: 6

E*TRADE

p16n82p77ms5dnlqoab1fad3gj9.jpg
2023 ranking: 7
2022 ranking: 7
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 691
2022 score: 708
2023 vs. 2022: (17)

Robinhood

The Robinhood application is displayed in the App Store on an Apple Inc. iPhone in an arranged photograph taken in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, Dec. 14, 2018. The Securities Investor Protection Corp. said a new checking account from Robinhood Financial LLC raises red flags and that the deposited funds may not be eligible for protection. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg
2023 ranking: 6
2022 ranking: 8
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 706
2022 score: 693
2023 vs. 2022: 13

Average industry score

2023 industry average score (on 1,000-point scale): 707
2022 industry average score: 720
2023 vs. 2022: (13)
Firm with largest increase: Robinhood - 13
Firm with largest decrease: Stash - 33

Fidelity

fidelity2
2023 ranking: 5
2022 ranking: 3
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 707
2022 score: 730
2023 vs. 2022: (23)

TD Ameritrade

TD Ameritrade building photo Bloomberg News
2023 ranking: 4
2022 ranking: 4
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 711
2022 score: 725
2023 vs. 2022: (14)

Charles Schwab

Charles-Schwab-window-Bloomberg-News
2023 ranking: 3
2022 ranking: 2
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 717
2022 score: 735
2023 vs. 2022: (18)

T. Rowe Price

t-rowe-price_416x416.jpg
2023 ranking: 2
2022 ranking: 5
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 724
2022 score: 724
2023 vs. 2022: -

Vanguard

vanguard-real-estate-logo
Suitable for use in public relations materials
2023 ranking: 1
2022 ranking: 1
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 734
2022 score: 736
2023 vs. 2022: (2)

Wells Fargo

Wells Fargo people walking by Bloomberg News
2023 ranking: 9
2022 ranking: 8
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 604
2022 score: 654
2023 vs. 2022: (50)

Merrill Edge

merrill.jpg
2023 ranking: 8
2022 ranking: 9
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 642
2022 score: 649
2023 vs. 2022: (7)

J.P. Morgan

Signage stands on display outside the JPMorgan & Chase Tower in downtown Chicago, Illinois, U.S., on Saturday, Oct. 7, 2017. AKA J.P. Morgan.
2023 ranking: 7
2022 ranking: 6
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 650
2022 score: 702
2023 vs. 2022: (52)

TD Ameritrade

TD Ameritrade building photo Bloomberg News
2023 ranking: 6
2022 ranking: 4
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 667
2022 score: 717
2023 vs. 2022: (50)

T. Rowe Price

t-rowe-price_416x416.jpg
2023 ranking: 5
2022 ranking: 1
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 671
2022 score: 768
2023 vs. 2022: (97)

Average industry score

2023 industry average score (on 1,000-point scale): 685
2022 industry average score: 708
2023 vs. 2022: (23)
Firm with largest increase: E*TRADE - 2
Firm with largest decrease: T. Rowe Price - 97

Vanguard

vanguard-real-estate-logo
2023 ranking: 4
2022 ranking: 2
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 690
2022 score: 721
2023 vs. 2022: (31)

Charles Schwab

Charles-Schwab-060518
2023 ranking: 3
2022 ranking: 3
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 695
2022 score: 719
2023 vs. 2022: (24)

E*TRADE

p16n82p77ms5dnlqoab1fad3gj9.jpg
2023 ranking: 2
2022 ranking: 7
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 698
2022 score: 696
2023 vs. 2022: 2

Fidelity

fidelity2
2023 ranking: 1
2022 ranking: 5
2023 score (on 1,000-point scale): 704
2022 score: 711
2023 vs. 2022: (7)
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING