We took a new look yet again at this year's top advisors and re-ranked them based solely on their annual production figures. For the original list, this was one of six metrics we used to determine the ranking. The other five were: assets under management; % change in AUM from previous year; % change in production; amount of fee-based business; and ratio of production-per-AUM.
Since the initial list, we have broken out some of the individual stats for fresh looks of our top advisors. You can see rankings based solely on
Scroll through to now see those bank advisors with the highest annual production. The numbers after their names indicate where they ranked on the original Top 100.
-
A well-rounded approach wins the day with the annual advisor ranking. No one-trick ponies allowed, as multiple metrics count toward advisors' scores, including AUM, production, growth and fee business.
December 7 - Here is the second segment of the expanded Top 100 Bank Advisors. The top 25, as well as those who ranked 51-100, are included in the corresponding slideshows.
- Here is the third segment of the expanded Top 100 Bank Advisors. You can see the top 50, as well as those who ranked 76-100, in our corresponding slideshows.
- Here is the fourth and final segment of the expanded Top 100 Bank Advisors. You can see all the others (1-75) in our corresponding slideshows.
Lee Conrad
