Bigger Fund Complexes Don’t Always Mean Better Returns

Fidelity. Vanguard. JPMorgan. The names of such leading financial companies evoke security and trust. But bigger financial firms don’t always mean better performance, Reuters reports, citing a study by T. Rowe Price.

The study looked at the collective performance of each fund complex’s offerings over one, three, five and 10 years ending March 31.

Seventy-nine percent of T. Rowe Price’s funds outperformed their peers over the past one and three years, 77% bested their peers over the past five years, and 74% over the past decade.

Vanguard also put in a strong showing, with 68% of this company’s funds outperforming their peers over the past year, 76% over the past three years, 79% over the past five years and 82% over the past 10 years.

However, Putnam Investments’ funds didn’t fare so well, with only 28% of them outperforming their peers over the past year. In the past decade, only 20% did better than their equals.

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Money Management Executive
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING