When Mark Mulholland was casting about for a name for his new fund in 1995, he eschewed the path that many independent managers take of naming the offering after themselves. Instead, he decided to call his fledgling fund Matthew 25, after a New Testament Bible passage that talks about using one's talents for the glory of God.

Though his fund does not invest according to any religious principles, Mulholland, a Catholic, was struck by what realizing one's talent in the investment business could entail. "I struggled with wealth accumulation, but I realized that if I do this job well, I may need to deal with wealth," he says.

Mulholland has certainly used his talents well and bolstered the wealth of some investors (including his family - he and his wife are the fund's biggest shareholders). In the last three years, Matthew 25, based in Jenkintown, Pa., has returned an annualized average of 24.4% a year through Jan. 10, placing it among the top 1% of large-cap growth funds, according to Morningstar. In the 10 years that ended on Jan. 10, the fund, which has $362 million in assets, was up an average of 8.9% a year, placing it in the category's best 13%.

A key to the fund's good showing seems to be Mulholland's free-roaming mandate, which allows him to find well-priced growth names in any industry he likes. Though the fund is categorized as a large-cap offering, he insists that's a misnomer. A few mega-cap names in the portfolio skew the average market weighting into large-cap territory.

Mulholland says he's been able to avoid blowups by practicing a simple valuation discipline: He rides stocks' growth swings for what he believes is three-quarters of the way out of a bear market before making his exit as prices move toward his calculation of fair value. When valuations get stretched, as they did in late 1999 and early 2000, Mulholland becomes defensive and may miss out on exuberant upswings.



The strategy misfired in 2008, however. The stock market plunge caught Mulholland off guard, and Matthew 25 declined 40.4%, its worst-ever one-year performance. Mulholland didn't fully appreciate how pervasive real estate and financial services had become in the economy because he didn't believe that stocks were overvalued at the time. "I got blindsided," he acknowledges.

He even says he's unsure he can prevent his fund from suffering a similar setback again. He did use the slump to stock up on bargains, however, which he is still riding to profits.

Mulholland believes the equity markets offer plenty of upside for quite some time. "We've had a stealth bull market, and the average person is not participating," he says, pointing to the fact that, for the fourth year in a row, asset flows into equities have dropped, according to research from the Investment Company Institute.

But Mulholland thinks there is room to run in the current bull market - arguing that the S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings ratio of 13.4, based on estimates from Birinyi Associates, is undervalued historically.

Mulholland spends a lot of time making sure he doesn't overpay for the holdings in his portfolio, which currently has just 21 names. When he believes the market is deeply undervalued or fairly valued - as he says it is now - he tends to have more names in his concentrated fund. When prices rise, he hunkers down and contracts into the high teens.

To understand if he's paying a fair price, Mulholland divides enterprise value (market value plus net debt) by EBITDA. He is on the hunt for companies whose multiple is less than 10. Mulholland likes the enterprise value-to-EBITDA measure because it can be used to compare companies across industries. P/Es can be distorted by a company's leverage and make debt-laden firms seem cheap.

Though his fund is concentrated in the number of names it holds, it still maintains diversification across sectors.



Matthew 25's largest holding is Apple (AAPL). Mulholland loaded up on the stock in the market slump of 2008 and 2009, when the shares dipped as low as $78. Even after a recent tumble, Apple shares were selling recently for six times more than that. Apple's superior products - Mulholland's family alone has five devices - have helped define the current technological boom in mobile devices, he believes.

"You have all this potential right in the middle of a major technology change," he says, noting that he's only paying six times enterprise to EBITDA.

Apple has had its share of problems. The company reportedly cut orders for components in December, with the market speculating that demand for the iPhone 5 softer than expected.



Mulholland believes that Polaris Industries (PII), a manufacturer of all-terrain vehicles, snowmobiles and jet skis, also has a winning strategy. Like Apple, Polaris, based in Medina, Minn., was added to the portfolio during the downturn. Polaris has entered the motorcycle market, which hasn't been totally smooth riding. "They were competing against Harley, which has incredible brand recognition," Mulholland says.

In 2011, Polaris pushed ahead with the acquisition of Indian, a maker of motorcycles whose strong brand loyalty rivals Harley-Davidson. Polaris already owned Victory motorcycles. The company is making inroads and is now No. 2 in sales of heavyweight motorcycles.

In the third quarter of 2012, Polaris earnings rose 39%, mostly on the strength of its snowmobiles. But Mulholland believes that the rollout of new Indian motorcycles later this year will add even more to the firm's bottom line.

The stock is worth 12 times more than what Mulholland paid for it back in 2008, so he's no longer adding to the position. Over the 12 months that ended on Jan. 10, shares were up 46.5%. "It's now more fairly priced," he adds.



Another name in the Matthew 25 lineup is Cabela's (CAB), based in Sidney, Neb., a retailer of hunting, fishing and camping gear. Though Mulholland initiated his position in the stock in 2007 at around $16 a share, he bought big when shares dipped below $5. The stock recently traded at $47, but Mulholland believes it could go higher still.

Cabela's has a robust mail-order and online business, and is expanding its retail footprint beyond the 32 stores it has in the U.S. and Canada. "It could triple its stores and not saturate the market," Mulholland says. The company's shares are up 76.4% over the last 12-months through Jan. 10, helped by a 20% increase in third-quarter earnings.

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK), the holding company run by Warren Buffett, has had a place in the fund since the beginning.

"I'm a big believer, if you've got something that's exceptional, you should stick with it," Mulholland says about the legendary Omaha, Neb.-based firm. And he has.



Ilana Polyak, a Financial Planning contributing writer in Northampton, Mass., has also written for The New York Times, Money and Kiplinger's.



Mark Mulholland

Matthew 25 Fund


Credentials: B.A. in economics, Lafayette College

Experience: Portfolio manager, Matthew 25 fund (1995-present); stockbroker, Boenning & Scattergood (1996-present); stockbroker, PaineWebber (1988-1995); stockbroker, Advest (1983-1988)

Ticker: MXXVX

Inception of fund: October 1995

Style: Large Growth

AUM: $362 million

Three-year performance as of Jan. 10: 24.39%

Five-year performance as of Jan. 10: 13.09%

Expense ratio: 1.22%

Front load: None

Minimum investment: $10,000

Alpha: 10.40 vs. S&P 500

Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Financial Planning content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access