The class-action lawsuit initiated by
The
Then there is the matter of anemic yields. With the Fed funds rate at an historic low of 25 basis points-and expected to remain there through 2011 and perhaps into 2012-it is increasingly difficult for money fund managers to find value in the short-term fixed income and cash marketplace. Last month, the cash-yield curve caved, bringing the one-month London interbank offered rate (Libor) down five basis points to 0.26%. As a result, the top-yielding individual money market fund from, from Dreyfus, is delivering a mere 0.24%. The top-yielding institutional money fund, from Fidelity, offers not much more: 0.31%.
These yields have money market experts beginning to ask: Will sponsors continue to absorb part of a money fund's fees to prop up the net asset value?
While it would only make common sense for money market funds to avoid going out on the yield curve following Primary Fund's debacle of breaking the buck, in this low rate environment, money funds may be doing just the opposite to attract assets. After all, money market funds peaked at $3.9 trillion in assets under management in January 2009, and currently command $2.8 trillion in AUM, a 28% decline.
Then there is the matter of gauging holdings and credit quality.
Fitch just released a report showing that U.S. closed-end funds, for instance, still have $26.4 billion in auction-rate preferred shares, one of the types of instruments that froze in 2008.
Money funds, miraculously, have held steady. But for the immediate future, it's likely to be an increasingly rocky road ahead.