Is Your Asset Minimum Too High?

Identifying reservoirs of new clients in a competitive sector like investment advising is never easy. But if you’ve established inflexible (or even random) new-account minimums, then you may actually be referring viable clients to the competition.

Get access to this article and thousands more...

All Financial Planning articles are archived after 7 days. REGISTER NOW for unlimited access to all recently archived articles, as well as thousands of searchable stories. Registered Members also gain access to exclusive industry white paper downloads, web seminars, blog discussions, the iPad App, CE Exams, and conference discounts. Qualified members may also choose to receive our free monthly magazine and any of our daily or weekly e-newsletters covering the latest breaking news, opinions from industry leaders, developing trends and growth strategies.

Already Registered?

Comments (6)
I always find it interesting when firms that do no financial planning, according to their ADV, are highlighted in 'Financial Planning' magazine for their business structure. Wouldn't this be more appropriate for Investment Advisor magazine?
Posted by Robert V | Thursday, November 21 2013 at 9:45AM ET
Robert V, agreed! I view myself as a financial planner first, so the first product I put in front of any new client is (98% of the time) a financial plan. I charge a fee for that plan regardless of whether the client has assets or not. If I am efficient enough creating the plan, I will make money doing that plan, even if the client never gives me assets to manage. Some firms are investment managers who happen to do some financial planning, we are financial planners who happen to manage assets for clients who need help keeping investments in sync with their retirement plans.
Posted by James K | Thursday, November 21 2013 at 5:49PM ET
What this article brings out can be pertinent if viewed in the broader context. The flipside of catering to every customer who approaches you, will we that you be spending time on the nickel-and-dime clients and not working enough for the High Networth Client or the mass affluent client. The strategy suggested in the second half deals with this isssue. Your whole range of services and expertise would be available to a premium clieent but would not be entirely available to the modest investor or the mass affluent investor. You have to maintain a balance.
Posted by tasha123 s | Friday, November 22 2013 at 6:16AM ET
Like to last note of tasha123; What still surprises me is the use of a traditional segmentation model (mainly based on AUM).
If you use a right pricing model you can offer the service clients need to the service clients wants.

Staying with your minimum AUM indeed excludes a large group of clients with potential. On the other hand it included a large group of clients that in potential is not looking for all detailed expertise, services and face to face contact. You can expect that group to increase enormous in the coming 25 years (because of the # of wealth transfers to younger generations).

Please find an article I wrote some time ago:
http://www.myprivatebanking.com/article/guest-article-by-linda-doesburg-and-boudewijn-chalmers-#!
Posted by Boudewijn C | Sunday, November 24 2013 at 5:40PM ET
This is a tight rope all financial advisors have to walk on. Whilst some would swear that a minimum asset level needs to be maintained for a person to be retained as a client, others would speak of lost opportunities in turning away people who do not make the mark. According to me, the trick is to identify customers based on their future growth potential. The millenium generation may be on the threshold of making their mark, have more of a risk appetite, are open to new ideas and have a future both in terms of earned wealth and inherited one. It would be a good idea to cherry pick some of the
members of the millenium club so that the firm could also grow with them.
Posted by KIMMY B | Monday, December 16 2013 at 2:36PM ET
Add Your Comments:
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.

Already a subscriber? Log in here