Fidelity says it will end custody relationships with RIAs under $100M

fidelity-investments-window-bloomberg
Victor J. Blue/Bloomberg
  • Key insight: Among many disruptions to the brokerage business following the move to commission-free trading, Fidelity is telling firms they need at least $100 million in assets to keep using it as a custodian.
  • What's at stake: Fidelity has told sub-$100 million independent RIAs they have until June 30 to meet the asset minimum or it will end their custodial relationship.
  • Expert quote: "It's a dramatic move because, you know, some of these advisors have been with Fidelity since day one and they never grew. They stayed the same size, and all of a sudden they're being kicked out." — Tim Welsh, founder of Nexus Strategies


Fidelity has a new message for RIAs using its custodial services: They need to have at least $100 million in client assets with the firm by next summer or move on.

Processing Content

Fidelity Investments this week sent out notices to RIAs that have entrusted it with less than $100 million in client assets informing them they have until June 30, 2027 to exceed that threshold if they want to keep using it as a custodian. Fidelity currently has a $100 million minimum that RIAs must meet to join its custodial services. The new announcement marks the first time it is applying the requirement retroactively to firms that are already with it.

"We recognize that changes require thoughtful planning, and you need time to determine the next steps for your firm and your customers," Fidelity wrote in its announcement of the new policy. "If you choose to move the assets you managed on the Fidelity platform to another custodian, Fidelity remains committed to servicing your needs during this transition."

An industry source familiar with the change said the custodial business has changed greatly in the past five and 10 years and that Fidelity has responded by reviewing its policy periodically.

READ MORE: Private business, even more confidential fees: The cost of Fidelity custody

Commission-fee trading has disrupted custodial business

Fidelity's custody business is the second largest among custodians entrusted with safeguarding the assets advisors manage on behalf of clients. It falls behind only Charles Schwab, and ahead of Pershing and LPL Financial. The research firm Cerulli Associates has estimated those four firms control nearly 85% of the custodial market in the U.S. 

The custodial business has long been lucrative. But some of its profits have come under pressure in recent years, most notably from many broker-dealers' decision to cease collecting commissions on securities trades. Firms have tried various ways of making up the losses, including cash sweeps (moving uninvested cash over to banks to be lent out and then sharing only part of the returns with clients) and payments for order flow (routing clients' transaction orders to wholesalers in return for payments).

Various analysts and industry experts have said firms should consider charging new custody fees set at a percentage of the assets they're safeguarding. Tim Welsh, the founder of the consulting firm Nexus Strategies, said Fidelity seems to be taking a different tack: cutting ties with its least lucrative RIA clients.

"It's a dramatic move because, you know, some of these advisors have been with Fidelity since day one and they never grew," Welsh said. "They stayed the same size, and all of a sudden they're being kicked out."

READ MORE: Are Altruist's technology and low fees enough to tame the giants?

'This isn't an abstract decision for us'

Alex Chalekian, the founder and CEO of Lake Avenue Financial in Pasadena, California, wrote on LinkedIn after receiving a notice from Fidelity that his firm has several accounts at Fidelity. "So this isn't an abstract decision for us," he wrote.

He said he understands custodians' need to make business decisions. Still, the new policy raises the question of: "If we want more independent firms to launch, grow, and make financial advice more accessible, what happens when smaller firms have fewer custodial options?" 

Chalekian wrote that his firm also holds client assets at the fintech and custodial firm Altruist. Altruist, which has no asset minimums, went from being an upstart to a possible disruptor in the custodian business in August after Vanguard Group announced plans to acquire it in a deal later this year.

Schwab, for its part, has no asset minimums but has taken steps in recent months that many in the RIA industry perceive as a competitive threat. In August, for instance, it announced it's raising to $5 million the minimum amount of assets clients must have to be referred to the roughly 150 RIAs that opted into the firm's Schwab Advisor Network. That change, set to take effect in early 2027, comes after Schwab raised the minimum to $2 million from $500,000 earlier this year.

Welsh, who was at Schwab from 1999 to 2006, said he thinks Schwab's changes have provided cover for other firms considering possibly unpopular changes with their RIA businesses.

"They're saying, 'Hey, you know what? I guess the window is open, and we can make some negative announcements ourselves,'" Welsh said.

Among other changes aimed at boosting revenue, Fidelity in June started charging investors in ETFs whose sponsors do not pay Fidelity asset fees a transaction charge equal to 5% of their investments. The charges are capped at $100.

READ MORE: Schwab raises fees on wealthy clients as upmarket push continues

The importance of the $100 million threshold

Jon Beatty, head of Schwab Advisor Services, noted that Schwab provides custodial and other services to thousands of small RIAs. Beatty said the firm works with more than 11,000 firms with less than $100 million in assets. 

"Small RIAs are the backbone of the independent advisory profession, and they always have been," he said. "Whether an advisor is just launching a firm or managing billions, our role is the same: help them grow, compete and succeed."

The $100 million asset threshold is significant in the wealth management industry because it marks the point at which RIAs can choose to be registered nationally with the Securities and Exchange Commission rather than with individual states. The Investment Adviser Association and regulator consultant Comply reported in June that there were more than 20,500 advisors registered at the state level or otherwise exempt from SEC registration requirements.

Michael Kitces, the co-founder of the XY Planning Network for RIAs, said he doubts any firm would decide to join Fidelity after crossing the $100 million threshold, especially since moving custodians is notoriously difficult. XY Planning Network provides services to more than 2,000 firms, many of them registered at the state level. 

"I don't know if they're giving up on our marketplace, or if they just truly believe it's not profitable for these advisors," Kitces said. "But it does seem short-sighted."

Firms that are part of the XY Planning Network custody clients assets at Schwab.

Will Trout, the director of securities and investments at Datos Insights, said Fidelity's new asset minimum is a clear sign of interest in working mainly with larger firms. Now the question is whether other firms will move in the same direction.

"If the major custodians follow suit, the industry undergoes a significant consolidation: The RIA market bifurcates into scale-driven platforms and niche players serving solo advisors," Trout said.

Introductory bullet points created by AI with editorial review.


For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Practice and client management Wealth management Industry News RIAs Clearinghouses/custodians Fidelity
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING
Load More