Focus, Goldman sued by celebrity business manager over $7B deal

With Focus Financial Partners set to go private and its competitors dissecting the ramifications of the deal worth more than $7 billion, one of the firms under its umbrella is crying foul.

A civil lawsuit filed late last month by accountant and celebrity business manager Mickey Segal of Los Angeles-based NKSFB accuses registered investment advisory firm consolidator Focus and the company that helped negotiate its pending sale to a private equity firm, Goldman Sachs, of breach of contract, fraudulent concealment and other violations of the law. Segal alleges that the companies undercut the potential sale of his own firm and defied their obligation to disclose their separate negotiations with bidders and the buyer, Clayton, Dubilier & Rice.  

The situation is "the perfect storm of a David and Goliath story," Segal said in an interview. "Their attitude is, 'We don't have to tell you or do anything. It's none of your freaking business.' Well, that's not what the documents say, and that's how we got here."

The lawsuit was first reported by the Financial Times, which cited sources that told the publication that NKSFB's business management clients have included Madonna, Drake and 13 of the past 15 halftime performers at the Super Bowl.

Representatives for Focus provided a statement to the Times that said the lawsuit has no merit and Segal is "attempting to take advantage of Focus' pending go-private acquisition to increase the economics he derives from the Focus partnership."

"These claims are without merit," Goldman spokeswoman Sophia Anthony said in a statement. "From the outset of our engagement, Goldman Sachs acted fairly and honestly to run an efficient, competitive process. Goldman Sachs had every incentive to achieve the best outcomes for both our clients, and it is absurd to suggest otherwise."

Segal's lawsuit followed the usual series of "investigation" announcements from law firms probing whether Clayton, Dubilier's purchase price of $53 per share in the February agreement represented the best possible bid for Focus shareholders. A 40-day "go-shop" period giving the company's board time to solicit additional offers expired on April 8 without any alternate proposals, according to the firm.

The deal has also prompted some reflection among industry experts and rival RIA aggregators about the lessons stemming from the five-year stint of Focus as a publicly traded firm. In a webinar last week led by RIA consultancy Advisor Growth Strategies Managing Partner John Furey, some of the industry's leading dealmakers explained why going public no longer looks as attractive at a time when private investors are offering 12 to even 20 times a firm's earnings.

"The notion used to be to say, 'Hey, you get your stage of funding, eventually you go to the public markets to get the most liquidity, the highest valuation," Furey said of the "very interesting" Focus transaction. "But is this proving, in our space, that is not the case?"

Mariner Wealth Advisors CEO Marty Bicknell answered "yes" to Furey's question. 

"To me, it says the public markets don't understand the wealth management business," Bicknell said. "Focus was taken private, as you mentioned, at a significant multiple discount to the last dozen or so deals of similar firms. And so, to me, that just says that the market is not valuing the business."

NKSFB joined Focus the same year that earlier private equity investors KKR and Stone Point Capital took the firm public. After starting as an accounting firm with just three clients in 1981, the firm has grown into the largest business manager in the country, according to Segal. It "provides a sophisticated range of concierge-style business management services to some of the world's top artists, performers, athletes and entrepreneurs," according to the lawsuit. 

When Focus purchased the company, it and the former owners created a separate management company that receives a fee based on Focus' profits from NKSFB. In the middle of last year, Segal and Focus began exploring a sale of NKSFB and the management company that received Focus' profits for NKSFB's former owners. At the urging of Focus, Segal's team hired Goldman to be its investment banker in the process. They agreed to hire Goldman last September and, the following month, the three parties signed a non-disclosure agreement requiring "that each of the joint clients would know what the other was doing with respect to the proposed transaction," according to the lawsuit.

"This was essential because bidders interested in buying the NKSFB business certainly could be interested in buying the entire public entity, Focus," it stated. "The last thing [the management company] wanted to do was share information with Goldman and Focus that they could use to sell off just NKSFB as part of a separate deal for Focus, as such a sale would negatively impact the attractiveness of [the management company] as an acquisition target. Unfortunately, that is exactly what happened."

Over the next several months, the parties spoke with 15 potential suitors and heard from another eight to 10 expressing interest, Segal said. Unbeknownst to him and his partners, Focus was moving forward with its own talks toward a potential sale. 

Five bids that amounted to roughly 20% of the purchase price of Focus ultimately came in for NKSFB, according to Segal. He argues that the other negotiations and eventual Feb. 2 announcement of exclusive talks between Focus and Clayton, Dubilier scared off as many as 15 other possible buyers, though.

"Focus secretly engaged Goldman as its investment banker for the sole and only purpose of selling the entire company of Focus, including the NKSFB business, and Focus and Goldman both concealed this fact from [the management company]," according to the lawsuit. 

"On February 2, 2023, [the management company] was shocked to learn that Focus and Goldman had been deceitful from the outset," it continued. "[The management company] learned via press release that Focus had already entered an exclusivity agreement with CD&R to negotiate terms for an agreement for CD&R to acquire Focus. Such a deal would necessarily involve acquiring NKSFB as well — the very situation that Goldman and Focus said would not happen, could not happen and that served as the impetus behind the carefully negotiated protections in the [non-disclosure agreement]."

The filing of the lawsuit in Los Angeles County court included a series of email exchanges and letters between Segal and Focus officials including General Counsel Russell McGranahan and co-founder Lenny Chang. One email last month from Goldman's head of the Financial Institutions Group, Pat Fels, informed Segal and the Focus officials that the NKSFB bidders who had spoken to the investment bankers had "indicated that they are prepared to move forward into the next round of the process and are standing by." Segal had written two days earlier that an "amicable meeting" between NKSFB and Focus was no longer possible, though.

"Of course you are supportive of the current process, without a deal a nuclear war will happen," Segal said in the email. "Of course Goldman wants this to happen because their breaches and conflicts will result in hundreds of millions of dollars of damages due to the lack of this process happening both because of your conflicted actions since Nov. 1 and because of your solicitations of buyers beginning end of December in order to try and overbid CD&R." 

In the interview, Segal said that the words "nuclear war" alluded to earlier comments from a top Goldman executive urging him not to "go nuclear on us" by suing the firm.

"I hope there's a way to work it out and find some amicable way to do that," Segal said. "The world should know this story." 

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Regulation and compliance Lawsuits M&A Focus Financial Partners Goldman Sachs
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING