The top U.S. derivatives regulator gave Wall Street two months to abide by a new policy imposing Dodd-Frank Act rules on banks when they arrange trades domestically and then book them overseas.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today postponed a Nov. 14 advisory that undermined a legal interpretation Wall Street had found buried in a footnote, number 513, in an earlier agency document. Banks relied on the footnote to keep swap deals off electronic platforms and away from the agency’s rules that were put in place in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.

The agency said in the letter today that it allowed the delay because “concerns have been raised” by swap dealers that “additional time is necessary to allow them to organize their internal policies and procedures to come into compliance.”

The Nov. 14 advisory said that U.S.-based traders who arrange, negotiate or execute a deal -- even on behalf of an overseas affiliate -- must comply with Dodd-Frank. Along with its potential to disrupt their current deals, banks are concerned that the language in the opinion is broad enough to expose their overseas deals to more regulation.

The delay comes as two Wall Street trade groups, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, are preparing to sue the CFTC as early as this week over foreign guidance the agency issued in July. The Nov. 14 advisory interprets that guidance.

Today’s delay gives derivatives dealers until Jan. 14 to comply with the advisory. One of the banks’ biggest complaints has been that the agency refused to publicly state when the advisory would take effect.


Gensler and the industry have been locked in a five-year battle over rules to make the $693 trillion derivatives market safer and less opaque. How to apply the new regulations overseas has been among the most contentious issues, with Goldman Sachs Group, JPMorgan Chase and other swap dealers pushing to limit the CFTC’s reach into other jurisdictions.

The biggest banks conduct at least half their swaps business with overseas clients, according to some estimates. Gensler has fought to extend his agency’s authority into foreign transactions, pointing out that several major financial failures, including the collapse of American International Group Inc., originated in overseas units.

After the CFTC guidance quashed their interpretation of the footnote, the industry decided to sue the agency, claiming that it didn’t follow the proper procedures for issuing regulations, according to people briefed on the matter.

Sifma has declined to comment on the potential case. A spokesman for Isda, Steven Kennedy, said the association is “extremely concerned” about the impact of the recent advisory opinions.



Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Financial Planning content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access