A U.S. Supreme Court case of a 401(k) investor from Dallas who claimed his employer failed to execute an order, costing him $150,000, may pave the way for lawsuits by individual investors, rather than class-action suits.

If the Supreme Court rules in James LaRue's favor, it could permit the 70 million defined contribution investors throughout the nation to forge their own lawsuits.

The Supreme Court decided to hear the case after the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., rejected it, saying it wasn't allowed under the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Thomas Gies, the attorney for LaRue's former employer, management consulting firm DeWolff Boberg & Associates, told the court that under ERISA, LaRue can use a court order to change his investments but that he is not entitled to money lost. But Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia said the court order would be too late to save any money LaRue may have lost, and Justices Stephen Breyer, John Paul Stevens and Samuel Alito also challenged Gies. Furthermore, an attorney representing the Bush administration told the court he is also in favor of supporting LaRue, as his case would help pave the way for protecting defined contribution plan participants. Recovered money wouldn't come out of the accounts of other participants but from the fiduciaries, the attorney said.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Subscribe Now

Access to premium content including in-depth coverage of mutual funds, hedge funds, 401(K)s, 529 plans, and more.

3-Week Free Trial

Insight and analysis into the management, marketing, operations and technology of the asset management industry.