-
The agency's potential retirement regulation got slammed at a congressional hearing and in thousands of industry-driven form letters calling for its withdrawal.
January 10 -
From 19K+ submissions, FP presents a handful of the most pertinent points; here's how Charles Schwab, the Consumer Federation of America, the Investment Company Institute and others argue the rule will affect wealth management.
January 3 -
The AARP, the Chamber of Commerce, Cetera, Betterment, FPA, CFP Board, NAPFA, FSI and other stakeholders weighed in on the agency's rule proposal.
December 27 -
The testifying group includes the CFP Board, AARP, the Insured Retirement Institute, the Financial Services Institute, several academics and financial advisors.
December 11 -
A public hearing on the "retirement security rule" is set for next week as opponents call for more time and express concern about the potential impact.
December 7 -
While the "retirement security rule" comprises the main part of the potential regulation, other shifts in existing standards will affect financial advisors as well.
November 22 -
While academics and supporters of the "retirement security rule" proposal say the administration's numbers are valid, critics reject them. Here's what we know.
November 14 -
Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su, President Biden and the AARP unveiled a major new potential regulation last week. Here's a sampling of what's in it.
November 7 -
A potential regulation called the "retirement security rule" is already facing pushback. Here are the first reactions across the industry in favor and against it.
October 31 -
Shoring up fiduciary obligations under ERISA would be a much-needed protection for investors.
May 31
Securities Arbitration Clinic at the Law School of St. John's University -
A new potential fiduciary rule and a court decision involving independent contractors have the industry and consumer advocates watching carefully.
March 30 -
Advocates hope the Labor Department's first clarification on the Trump-era advice rule is the beginning of a series of steps to improve advice standards.
April 19 -
the Labor Department said it wouldn’t enforce Trump-era rules for fund investments or proxy voting, nor will it sanction retirement plans that don’t comply with the regulations.
March 11 -
The department says it is working “to determine how we might improve” the regulation.
February 12 -
Some advisory firms have already started narrowing their lists of funds considered eligible for retirement plans based on Trump’s decision to overhaul ERISA.
January 27 -
The regulation permits more exemptions from fiduciary duties, but may itself be replaced by the incoming Biden administration.
December 16 -
Existing regulations that protect investors and deliver clarity to the industry must be preserved by the incoming administration, writes Financial Services Institute CEO Dale Brown.
November 20
Financial Services Institute -
Big changes to regulations and retirement planning could be in the mix following the Democrat’s election victory.
November 7 -
What different outcomes could mean for financial planners and their clients.
November 4 -
The rule has faced a host of criticism from investors, environmentalists, asset managers and others.
November 3
















