Bank of America was accused in a lawsuit of providing more than 100 accounts used to perpetrate what U.S. regulators called a $102 million Ponzi scheme.
The class-action suit filed on behalf of people who lost money follows
One of the alleged ringleaders once commissioned a song about himself for a party in Las Vegas with lyrics celebrating his $10,000 suits and his partner’s affinity for champagne, according to Monday’s complaint in federal court in Ocala, Florida.
Emelie Fritz is workplace well-being director at Lifesum, where she works at the intersection of health, behaviour change and workplace culture. She regularly comments on employee wellbeing, workplace trends and the habits shaping how people live, work and perform. Through her work, she helps organisations, including GE and PayPal, better understand the relationship between health, productivity and long-term well-being.
As the best-selling memoir "Strangers" shines a spotlight on financial disengagement, advisors share how they pull the less-engaged spouse into the conversation before it's too late.
Morningstar finds that active investment managers beat low-cost passive index trackers only 27% of the time over a 12-month stretch.
The brother and sister who sued to recover losses from their late father’s investment claim the fraudsters “could not have perpetuated their scheme without the knowing assistance of their primary banking institution, Bank of America, which lent the scheme an air of legitimacy and provided critical support, including at times when the scheme would have otherwise collapsed," according to the complaint.
Bank of America spokesman Bill Halldin had no immediate comment on the suit.
The lender is accused of failing to spot suspicious activity, including deposits of hundreds of thousands of dollars into accounts with relatively small, negative or nonexistent balances, followed by transfers within the same week to other accounts or investors seeking to cash out.
The architects of the scheme promised they would put investor funds into profitable and perhaps dividend-paying companies, according to the SEC. But they spent $20 million from the investment pool to enrich themselves, made $38.5 million in "Ponzi-like payments" and transferred much of the rest away from the companies that were supposed to receive the money, the regulator said.
