RBC beats out Fidelity, Edward Jones and Schwab in client satisfaction

Clients have sent the wealth management industry an important annual report card — and it wasn’t pretty for many of the most prominent firms in the space.

Perennial contender RBC beat out Fidelity Investments, Edward Jones, Charles Schwab and Raymond James to take the top spot in J.D. Power’s 2020 survey of full-service investor satisfaction. Voya Financial Advisors, Northwestern Mutual, Lincoln Financial Network, Prudential and Equitable Advisors came in at the bottom of this year’s rankings.

The companies building trust from clients, supporting their relationships with advisors, enabling digital communication, committing to social causes and hiring more women are ahead of their peers, according to the survey of investors who have worked with financial advisors. The results arrived with the coronavirus pandemic rippling across the industry — and the country.

“We know our clients in the industry have been increasingly interested in understanding the drivers of brand trust,” says Mike Foy, senior director of J.D. Power's wealth management practice. “It's particularly critical in an environment like we're in today, where people are obviously very concerned, they’re probably uncertain about what to do.”

He adds the data supports the notion “that if people do trust the brand and they trust the advisor, they're going to be more likely to follow the advice that's provided.” While J.D. Power isn’t publicly releasing the index of client trust that it compiled for the first time in the survey's 18-year history, Foy says the metric has a pretty strong correlation with overall satisfaction.

Which broker-dealers are rated highest for advisor satisfaction?
Two perennial champions retained their top ranks in 2019 — but the aging demographic poses challenges for all firms, according to J.D. Power.

The key drivers of the client trust metric and overall satisfaction also displayed themes in common: acknowledging and resolving mistakes; giving out useful information; living up to service expectations and putting clients’ interest first. The strong and rising equity values at the time of the survey between November and January also boosted the industry’s average satisfaction index to a record 850 out of 1,000.

Top performers in client satisfaction excelled in areas unaffected by the turmoil sending equities tumbling in historic proportions. RBC and Edward Jones received high marks for advisor service, while Schwab and Fidelity drew praise for their digital client experience, the quality of products and low commissions and fees, according to Foy.

Lower ratings among other firms stemmed from bad grades for experiences with advisors, which represents about one-third of the satisfaction index. Still, less than 100 points separated the top firm and last firm on the list. Equitable — formerly known as AXA Advisors — reeled in the most improved mark of any firm year-over-year even though it was near the bottom.

After Advisor Group snagged the best improvement in its grades year-over-year in 2019, it dropped well out of the top 3 and absorbed the largest decrease from the prior year in 2020. M&A deals like Advisor Group’s Ladenburg Thalmann acquisition usually lead to lower marks in the short term, and the nine broker-dealer network shows variance between firms, Foy says.

The survey also yielded notable figures across all firms in the space. For starters, millennial women are almost 2.5 times more likely than older female clients to work with an advisor of the same sex. Male advisors still far outnumber women in the profession.

“As this generation grows and inherits wealth, it's important for the firms to close the gap between female-owned wealth and representation in the industry,” Foy says. “Having diversity that’s reflective of the market is an important aspirational goal.”

Another result has become even more pertinent for a time of remote work. Advisors who spoke to clients four or more times in the past year through digital means like texting, emailing or video were 50% more likely than those who didn’t use any online contact to garner increased investments. At the same time, 94% of clients said they never spoke to their advisor on video.

Lastly, more than three quarters of clients who rated their firm a 9 or a 10 for its commitment to social causes said they “definitely will” recommend it to friends and family. At a score of 6 or lower, only 32% said they would definitely refer others to the firm.

J.D. Power spoke with 4,532 clients who make at least some of their investments with the help of a financial advisor. The firm compiled overall satisfaction on seven weighted factors, with financial advisors as the most important. At least 100 clients of any firm must participate in the survey for the company to show up on J.D. Power’s list.

To view last year’s results, click here. For this year’s ranking of client satisfaction, scroll down the list below.

JDPower.2020clients.No19.png
19. Voya Financial Advisors
2020 ranking: 19
2019 ranking: NA
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 795
2019 score: NA
2020 vs. 2019: NA
JDPower.2020clients.No18.png
18. Northwestern Mutual
2020 ranking: 18
2019 ranking: 13
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 816
2019 score: 820
2020 vs. 2019: (-4)
JDPower.2020clients.No17.png
17. Lincoln Financial Network
2020 ranking: 17
2019 ranking: 13
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 825
2019 score: 820
2020 vs. 2019: +5
JDPower.2020clients.No16.png
16. Prudential
2020 ranking: 16
2019 ranking: NA
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 829
2019 score: NA
2020 vs. 2019: NA
JDPower.2020clients.No15.png
15. Equitable Advisors (formerly AXA Advisors)
2020 ranking: 15
2019 ranking: 15
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 830
2019 score: 797
2020 vs. 2019: +33
JDPower.2020clients.No14.png
14. TIAA
2020 ranking: 14
2019 ranking: NA
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 834
2019 score: NA
2020 vs. 2019: NA
JDPower.2020clients.No13.png
13. Advisor Group
2020 ranking: 13
2019 ranking: 3
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 835
2019 score: 846
2020 vs. 2019: (-11)
JDPower.2020clients.No12.png
12. Citigroup
2020 ranking: 12
2019 ranking: 13
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 837
2019 score: 820
2020 vs. 2019: +17
JDPower.2020clients.No11a.png
11. (tie) Merrill
2020 ranking: 11
2019 ranking: 12
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 840
2019 score: 825
2020 vs. 2019: +15
JDPower.2020clients.No11.png
11. (tie) LPL Financial
2020 ranking: 11
2019 ranking: 14
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 840
2019 score: 814
2020 vs. 2019: +26
JDPower.2020clients.No10.png
10. UBS
2020 ranking: 10
2019 ranking: 6
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 843
2019 score: 840
2020 vs. 2019: +3
JDPower.2020clients.No9.png
9. Stifel Financial
2020 ranking: 9
2019 ranking: 10
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 844
2019 score: 827
2020 vs. 2019: +17
JDPower.2020clients.No8.png
8. Morgan Stanley
2020 ranking: 8
2019 ranking: 4
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 846
2019 score: 844
2020 vs. 2019: +2
JDPower.2020clients.No7.png
7. JPMorgan Chase
2020 ranking: 7
2019 ranking: 11
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 847
2019 score: 826
2020 vs. 2019: +21
JDPower.2020clients.Avg.png
Average score
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 850
2019 score: 835
2020 vs. 2018: +15
Largest increase: Equitable Advisors (+33)
Largest decrease: Advisor Group (-11)
JDPower.2020clients.No6.png
6. Wells Fargo Advisors
2020 ranking: 6
2019 ranking: 9
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 852
2019 score: 829
2020 vs. 2019: +23
JDPower.2020clients.No5.png
5. Ameriprise
2020 ranking: 5
2019 ranking: 7
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 855
2019 score: 838
2020 vs. 2019: +17
JDPower.2020clients.No4a.png
4. (tie) Raymond James
2020 ranking: 4
2019 ranking: 8
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 857
2019 score: 836
2020 vs. 2019: +21
JDPower.2020clients.No4.png
4. (tie) Charles Schwab
2020 ranking: 4
2019 ranking: 5
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 857
2019 score: 842
2020 vs. 2019: +15
JDPower.2020clients.No3.png
3. Edward Jones
2020 ranking: 3
2019 ranking: 1
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 860
2019 score: 853
2020 vs. 2019: +7
JDPower.2020clients.No2.png
2. Fidelity Investments
2020 ranking: 2
2019 ranking: 9
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 865
2019 score: 836
2020 vs. 2019: +29
JDPower.2020clients.No1.png
1. RBC
2020 ranking: 1
2019 ranking: 2
2020 score (on 1,000-point scale): 873
2019 score: 848
2020 vs. 2019: +25
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING