The SEC may be refining its approach to spurring good cybersecurity practices in advisers, but its expectations aren't slackening.
There's been "a conscious decision" at the agency to lead through the exam process, rather than enforcement, said David Glockner, regional director of the SEC's Chicago office.
"There've been a handful of enforcement cases in this area," Glockner said, "but if you step back and think about it, there are way more incidents, way more issues that pop up in exams than there are enforcement referrals or enforcement actions."
But even if the commission will discipline advisers sparingly and bring actions in the
Schwab services 16,000 RIAs with 2,000 different fee structures. According to the industry's largest custodian, the exact costs come down to "a very personalized negotiation" with the firms.
Blue Owl has borne the brunt of investor angst around private credit and their non-traded BDCs after a scrutinized and eventually scrapped merger of two of its private credit funds in November led the manager to halt redemptions from the non-traded vehicle.
As a starting point, officials recommend advisers take an inventory of their digital assets to determine the various entry points that hackers could take to infiltrate their systems, including a thorough vetting of all the outside vendors a firm contracts with.
Regulators have revealed what kind of issues advisors must address if faced with a review.
To ensure that personnel throughout the firm are cognizant of the myriad cyber threats, the SEC urges firm leaders to elevate the issue as a business priority, appealing for a tone at the top that prevents cybersecurity issues from being marginalized as simply a matter for the IT department.
But in some firms, there remains a tension between business and cybersecurity concerns, according to Steven Levine, an associate regional director at the SEC's Chicago office.
Levine has
Often, branch managers look to bring in high-producing industry veterans who might resist the firm's cybersecurity policies and procedures, which puts additional onus on the chief compliance officer to lay down the law, Levine says.
