Voices

Why recidivist fraudsters fall through the cracks

A former broker barred from the industry 16 years ago is charged with running his second multimillion-dollar investment scheme — a stark sign of how hard it is for regulators to put bad actors out of business.

Peter Krieger stole $5.2 million out of roughly $15 million raised from 23 investors, some of them "elderly," that was supposed to go toward an oil refinery and storage facility in the Bahamas, the Securities and Exchange Commission said on March 15. Instead, Krieger, 49, steered the money to his personal accounts for vacations in Aspen and Hawaii, luxury cars, jewelry, designer clothes and day-to-day living expenses, according to investigators.

The theft wasn't Krieger's first scam. In 2005, the SEC accused him and two others of misappropriating $3.7 million from the $7.5 million they received for investments in their hedge fund. After pleading guilty to a felony in connection with that case in Florida state court, Krieger agreed in a 2007 settlement with the SEC to be "barred from association" with any broker, dealer or investment advisory firm. 

That didn't keep him out of the investing game.

When banned from the securities industry, bad actors can simply say, "Okay, fine, I'll do it as an unregistered crook," said fraud expert Douglas Schulz of Westcliffe, Colorado-based Invest Securities Consulting.

"They did kick him out," Schulz said in an interview. But to no avail. "They're not even doing a very good job of monitoring —  much less catching — the ones that are in their system. Now that the guy's been thrown out of the system, I don't know what more I'd have them do."

A lawyer representing Krieger didn't respond to a phone call and email seeking comment.

Asked what metrics the SEC could disclose on its progress in stopping bad actors from engaging in repeat misconduct, a commission spokesman declined to comment beyond the press release and court filings in Miami federal court in Krieger's new case. Krieger's latest alleged theft took place over three and a half years until mid-2020, court papers show.

The SEC can point to some positive outcomes — its enforcement division secured a record $6.4 billion in penalties and restitution in the last fiscal year. Still, bad actors continue to find a way around regulators until it's often too late for victims to get full compensation for their losses.

Part of the problem stems from a subtlety often left out in discussions of the industry's most important distinction: that between registered investment advisors, who must place their clients' interests ahead of their own as fiduciaries, and brokers, who only need to make recommendations in their "best interest." 

Advisors, and an increasing number of clients, know that the former standard upheld by RIAs usually — but not always — ensures better outcomes for investors.

For instance, take a look at the disparity between RIAs and brokerages in annual audit examinations. In its last fiscal year, the SEC examined only about 15% of the more than 15,000 RIAs across the country, according to the agency. As for brokerages, The SEC and another financial regulator it oversees, FINRA, audited nearly half of the 3,500 firms they oversee. 

That difference in audits displays another angle of the ongoing momentum toward the industry's record number of RIAs. Any veteran advisor will tell you that dropping FINRA registration to go "full RIA" or "RIA-only" will reduce or get rid of many of their compliance burdens.

The upshot is that unregistered actors like Krieger can often operate without any oversight. In each of their latest annual enforcement reports, the SEC and state regulators cited cases involving unlicensed bad actors and unregistered products drawing victims to investment schemes. 

Regulators often acknowledge the difficulty of catching and preventing fraud. They have limited staffing and investigatory resources to police an industry of more than 300,000 financial advisors and tens of thousands of brokerages and SEC- and state-supervised RIAs. Victims might not put a fraudster on the authorities' radar until they manage to figure out that their accounts are missing money. 

Unfortunately, the best available research and anecdotal evidence suggest that multiple offenses are commonplace. 

Financial advisors who have committed misconduct are five times more likely than their average peers to engage in further offenses, according to a 2018 academic study. Another study published last year found that many repeat offenders — often referred to as "rogue" or "recidivist" brokers or advisors — simply dropped their FINRA licenses and the scrutiny that goes with them for less-frequent SEC audits or even less rigorous state insurance regimes.

The industry can point to many examples of recidivist advisors, including an SEC case earlier this month alleging that two advisors who are twin brothers scammed at least 60 clients out of $5 million. The pair kept getting new jobs as full-RIA advisors despite being terminated by their prior firms based on suspicions they were overcharging clients and using their login credentials.

Like those twin brothers, Krieger built up a trusting base of investors. Most of the customers "are friends with [Krieger] and each other, live at least part-time in the same community and were solicited by word-of-mouth," his charging document said. 

As the manager of a Florida-based limited liability company called Oban Energy, Krieger won over the firm's board and the government of the Bahamas as well, even as he was luring unwitting investors into supposedly investing in the island nation's energy industry.

"In reality, from January 2017 through August 2020, [Krieger] misappropriated approximately $5.2 million of investor funds to pay for personal expenses, such as luxury cars, jewelry, and vacations," the SEC said. 

Krieger agreed to a "partial settlement" with the regulator, which is awaiting court approval, to ban him from being an officer or director of any public company and order civil penalties, disgorgement and interest. 

Board directors at Oban Energy removed him from the company upon learning of his thefts in late 2020, according to investigators. The shareholders later formed a new firm, Lucayan Trans Fuels, that acquired the assets of Oban. 

Its website advertises the same "Bahamian Opportunity."

The president of Dallas-based Lucayan, Rick Duszynski, said in an email that the firm has no association with Oban's former officers. He referred any questions about the project in the Bahamas to the firm's website. 

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Regulation and compliance Risk Fraud prevention SEC FINRA
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING