Edward Jones, SoFi lead JD Power investor satisfaction rankings

Traditional wealth management firms can tap into a "gateway" of younger clients — but only if they offer technology tools similar to those of upstart do-it-yourself (DIY) firms, a new study said.

The two rankings below show how several dozen firms rated among clients who have hired financial advisors and those who are DIY investors. The results come from research and consulting firm JD Power's annual U.S. Investor Satisfaction Study, unveiled March 18.

SoFi, Citi, Ally Financial, Fidelity Investments and Vanguard grabbed the top five spots for investor satisfaction grades among DIY clients, while Edward Jones, U.S. Bank, Ameriprise, Citi, Stifel Financial and Vanguard (the latter three firms tied in fourth place) notched the highest ratings among advised clients. Last year's advised clients champion, Raymond James, fell just below the average grade for the channel this year. But the 2025 winner among DIY clients, Vanguard, stayed near the top of that segment.

More important than which companies topped the rankings, though, was the presence of fintech firms in the upper echelons, reflecting their growing reach in retail wealth management services, according to Mike Foy, the managing director of JD Power's wealth management practice. Newer names with a fintech focus in the wealth management retail marketplace like SoFi, Ally, WeBull, Robinhood, E-Trade from Morgan Stanley, Acorns and Stash appeared prominently on the list beside brands that have been fixtures for many more decades. But only some of them rated ahead of the more established names for investor satisfaction.

"Two of the top three ranked brands for do-it-yourself investor satisfaction in this year's study are fintechs, which is noteworthy because they are increasingly being viewed not only as innovators but also as trusted brands — and attracting affluent investors along the way," Foy said in a statement. "Another major trend we see this year is steadily increasing interest among younger, affluent DIY investors in seeking professional advice. Brands that can attract these clients when they are new to investing and offer them flexible options for both digital and human advice as their needs become more complex will be the big winners going forward."

To that point, the share of DIY investors with $250,000 or more in investable assets who described themselves as "definitely likely" to hire an advisor within the next year rose to 19% from only 10% in the previous annual survey. Among those with that level of investable assets who have children, the share expanded to 24% from 15% in the prior year.

In fact, the so-called robo advisor services that provide guidance alongside investing services appear to be acting as a "gateway, not replacement, for human advice," JD Power's news release said. At least 17% of DIY robo advice clients said they're "definitely likely" to hire an advisor in the next 12 months, compared to only 4% of DIY clients who don't receive any robo advice. For DIY investors with at least $250,000 in assets, the share who are getting robo advice and expecting to work with a human advisor in the next year was 28%.

Scroll down the slideshow for JD Power's investor satisfaction rankings, with the DIY group first, followed by the full-service clients. To see which firms got the highest scores in last year's investor survey, click here. For results from prior years in the full-service investor satisfaction study, see our slideshows from 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Consumer research, consulting, data and analytics firm JD Power conducts the "JD Power U.S. Investor Satisfaction Study" each year. Only firms with at least 100 customers in the poll received individual customer satisfaction grades on a 1,000-point scale based on the following seven factors: "digital channels; ease of doing business; people; product and service offerings; resolving problems or complaints; trust; and value for fees paid." The company spoke with 7,982 advised investment clients and 4,335 DIY investors between January 2025 and January 2026.

Its rankings included a disclosure that they are "based on numerical scores, and not necessarily on statistical significance." Where applicable, the below rankings include the firms' score last year in the JD Power investor survey and the difference between the two years.

DIY investor services

14. Wells Fargo's WellsTrade

2026 score: 657
2025 score: 637
2026 vs. 2025: +20

13. JPMorgan Chase's J.P. Morgan Wealth Management

2026 score: 669
2025 score: 664
2026 vs. 2025: +5

11. (tie) Stash

2026 score: 671
2025 score: 669
2026 vs. 2025: +2

11. (tie) E-Trade from Morgan Stanley

2026 score: 671
2025 score: 655
2026 vs. 2025: +16

10. Acorns

2026 score: 673
2025 score: 673
2026 vs. 2025: 0

8. (tie) Robinhood

2026 score: 681
2025 score: 655
2026 vs. 2025: +26

8. (tie) Merrill Edge

2026 score: 681
2025 score: 656
2026 vs. 2025: +25

7. WeBull

2026 score: 683

6. Charles Schwab

2026 score: 686
2025 score: 661
2026 vs. 2025: +25

DIY investor average satisfaction score

2026 score: 688
2025 score: 676
2026 vs. 2025: +12

5. Vanguard

2026 score: 700
2025 score: 704
2026 vs. 2025: (-4)

3. (tie) Fidelity Investments

2026 score: 707
2025 score: 703
2026 vs. 2025: +4

3. (tie) Ally Financial

2026 score: 707

2. Citi

2026 score: 710

1. SoFi

2026 score: 724

Advised investor services

23. Equitable Advisors

2026 score: 680
2025 score: 681
2026 vs. 2025: (-1)

22. TIAA

2026 score: 688
2025 score: 716
2026 vs. 2025: (-28)

20. (tie) Truist Wealth

2026 score: 693
2025 score: 678
2026 vs. 2025: +15

20. (tie) Prudential Advisors

2026 score: 693
2025 score: 686
2026 vs. 2025: +7

19. Northwestern Mutual

2026 score: 699
2025 score: 701
2026 vs. 2025: (-2)

18. PNC Wealth Management

2026 score: 701
2025 score: 717
2026 vs. 2025: (-16)

17. Principal Financial Group

2026 score: 704

14. (tie) Wells Fargo Advisors

2026 score: 714
2025 score: 709
2026 vs. 2025: +5

14. (tie) LPL Financial

2026 score: 714
2025 score: 709
2026 vs. 2025: +5

14. (tie) Citizens Bank Wealth Management

2026 score: 714

13. Merrill

2026 score: 715
2025 score: 700
2026 vs. 2025: +15

12. Charles Schwab

2026 score: 717
2025 score: 700
2026 vs. 2025: +17

11. Morgan Stanley

2026 score: 721
2025 score: 727
2026 vs. 2025: (-6)

10. Raymond James

2026 score: 724
2025 score: 748
2026 vs. 2025: (-24)

Advised investor average satisfaction score

2026 score: 725
2025 score: 714
2026 vs. 2025: +11

9. JPMorgan Chase's J.P. Morgan Wealth Management

2026 score: 725
2025 score: 725
2026 vs. 2025: 0

7. (tie) UBS

2026 score: 727
2025 score: 716
2026 vs. 2025: +11

7. (tie) Fidelity Investments

2026 score: 727
2025 score: 714
2026 vs. 2025: +13

4. (tie) Vanguard

2026 score: 736
2025 score: 721
2026 vs. 2025: +15

4. (tie) Stifel Financial

2026 score: 736
2025 score: 709
2026 vs. 2025: +27

4. (tie) Citi

2026 score: 736
2025 score: 707
2026 vs. 2025: +29

3. Ameriprise

2026 score: 743
2025 score: 728
2026 vs. 2025: +15

2. U.S. Bank

2026 score: 746
2025 score: 738
2026 vs. 2025: +8

1. Edward Jones

2026 score: 754
2025 score: 734
2026 vs. 2025: +20

MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING
Load More