© 2019 SourceMedia. All rights reserved.

Worst-performing funds of 2018

A narrow focus compounded by high fees are some of the leading causes behind the poor returns of this year’s worst-performing mutual funds and ETFs.

Among those that ranked at the bottom of the pack — with losses exceeding 20% as the end of the year draws close — commodities, emerging markets and homebuilder funds dominated the list. These funds held approximately $21 billion in client assets, according to Morningstar Direct data.

“The worst-performing funds this year, and in most any year, tend to be narrow segments of the market,” says Greg McBride, senior financial analyst at Bankrate, adding that, “sector investing is a supplement to, not a replacement for, owning broad-based funds that invest across entire markets, covering all sizes of market capitalization, and both growth and value disciplines.”

Expense ratios among the worst-performers were higher than of those with the best year-to-date return figures, data show. At an average 1.01%, these 20 funds charged nearly 15 basis points higher than the average top-performing fund. The average expense ratio of the 20 mutual funds and ETFs at the top of the pack were an average of 0.87%.

Both extremes of the fund universe, however, came at a costly price to clients. On average, investors paid just 0.52% for fund investing last year, according to a Morningstar study that reviewed the asset-weighted average expense ratios of nearly 25,000 U.S. mutual funds and ETFs. That was 8% less than how much they paid in 2016.

“Investing in smaller, narrower segments of the market is often feast or famine,” McBride says. “There will be years when the performance leads the pack and years when it trails badly.”

For advisors with clients worried about poor returns having an impact on their retirement portfolios, McBride says sticking to long-term strategy is the best advice. “Even in the face of poor short-term performance, the long-term thesis may still be valid.”

Scroll through to see the 20 mutual funds and ETFs with the worst YTD returns. Return figures are as of Dec. 6. Funds with investment minimums over $100,000 were excluded, as were leveraged and institutional funds. Three-year returns, assets and expense ratios for each fund are also listed. All data from Morningstar Direct.

FP_121218_20.png
First Eagle Gold A (SGGDX)
Front load: 5.00%
FP_121218_19.png
SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB)
FP_121218_18.png
Global X Robotics & Artfcl Intllgnc ETF (BOTZ)
FP_121218_17.png
VanEck Emerging Markets A (GBFAX)
Front load: 5.75%
FP_121218_16.png
Natixis Oakmark International A (NOIAX)
Front load: 5.75%
FP_121218_15.png
Fiera Capital Emerging Markets Inv (RIMIX)
FP_121218_14.png
iShares MSCI Europe Financials ETF (EUFN)
FP_121218_13.png
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources B (PRGNX)
Deferred load: 5.00%
FP_121218_12.png
Tocqueville Gold (TGLDX)
FP_121218_11.png
VanEck International Investors Gold A (INIVX)
Front load: 5.75%
FP_121218_10.png
VanEck Global Hard Assets A (GHAAX)
Front load: 5.75%
FP_121218_9.png
Janus Henderson European Focus A (HFEAX)
Front load: 5.75%
FP_121218_8.png
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A ETF (ASHR)
FP_121218_7.png
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals A (FKRCX)
Front load: 5.50%
FP_121218_6.png
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)
FP_121218_5.png
iShare US Construction ETF (ITB)
FP_121218_4.png
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Investor (RSNRX)
FP_121218_3.png
VanEck Vectors Oil Services ETF (OIH)
FP_121218_2.png
Victory Global Natural Resources A (RSNRX)
Front load: 5.75%
FP_121218_1.png
iShares MSCI Turkey ETF (TUR)