Snap! Commonwealth's clean BrokerCheck streak ends after 3 years
Commonwealth Financial Network lost two client arbitration cases and agreed to pay $888,000 restitution while accepting a censure from FINRA — in a three-week span. The firm had previously gone three years with no sanctions by regulators at any level.
Commonwealth disgorged the payment to 688 retirement plan and charitable organization accounts it “disadvantaged” over eight years by selling them mutual fund share classes without sales-charge waivers, the regulator said last month. FINRA has hit three dozen firms with similar cases ending in settlements.
The case and the arbitration decisions show how the firm has — like its more frequently dinged peers — been grappling in recent years with issues relating to mutual fund fees and supervision of advisors with multiple disclosures. Private arbitrations make the nature of the cases difficult to discern, though.
Commonwealth advisor James A. King III of Austin Financial Management lists three judgments and one settlement for a combined $841,000 on FINRA BrokerCheck in client arbitration cases in the past four years. Two FINRA arbitration panels awarded former clients of King a combined $257,000 in separate decisions on Oct. 30 and Nov. 12.
The clients won the decisions from Charlotte, North Carolina-based panels after accusing King and the firm of fraud, unsuitability, negligence, failure to supervise and other claims in filings on the same day in May 2017. The cases focus on IRA rollovers of the clients’ stock holdings in the retailer Lowe’s.
Commonwealth rather than the advisor paid an earlier $580,000 award to a different client represented by the same attorney and argued he “did not act improperly,” King commented on BrokerCheck. The firm has also said it doesn’t recruit or retain any advisors who need heightened supervision and therefore doesn’t use it.
However, King’s six client-claim disclosures and one dismissed case place him “in a very small percentage of brokers” who have that many, points out Christine Lazaro, president of the Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association.
Share class selection “shouldn’t be that difficult for a firm to supervise,” but the number of firms involved in such cases shows “why higher standards really are necessary,” she says. FINRA cited no relevant disciplinary history for Commonwealth in the settlement, despite its size and time in business.
“Firms aren’t going to be perfect, and I think the important thing is that, if something does go wrong, that they make it right for investors,” Lazaro says. “Investors really do trust their investment professional, so it’s important that the firms earn that trust.”
King didn’t respond to requests for comment at his Greensboro-based practice. Representatives for Commonwealth declined to discuss King’s status or the arbitration cases. The firm did say it was pleased to have the FINRA mutual-fund case resolved.
“Upon discovering the issue, we took immediate corrective action, initiating our own investigation and paying restitution to clients prior to FINRA’s intervention,” Chief Compliance Officer Paul Tolley said in a statement.
Representatives for FINRA also declined to discuss King’s record as shown by the arbitration disclosures, instead referring questions about his individual case to a speech by CEO Robert Cook last year outlining its increased oversight of what the regulator calls “high-risk” representatives and firms.
“Firms must do their part by, among other steps, reviewing their hiring practices, monitoring their brokers, improving supervisory systems, and investigating red flags suggestive of misconduct,” Cook said.
Jonathan E. Neuman, the attorney who has represented clients in all of the completed arbitration cases involving King and Commonwealth, declined to discuss the most recent decisions. A former business partner of King’s, fellow Commonwealth advisor Suzanne Banzet, didn’t reply to requests for comment.
FINRA guidelines required her to list arbitration cases involving King on her BrokerCheck record, she wrote in a comment, even though the filings didn’t name her as a respondent. Neither King nor Banzet has any enforcement disclosures, and neither has any disciplinary history with the CFP Board.
Clients of King’s pressed the first case in 2013 against Commonwealth, winning the highest payout of $580,000 in 2014 after alleging the firm recommended that the client retire early and roll over his employee stock ownership plan into an IRA product. The claimants had requested a $1 million award.
The second case ended in a $4,000 settlement and a ruling in April 2017 expunging the records of King and Banzet. The representatives had not engaged in an “investment-related sales practice violation, forgery, theft, misappropriation, or conversion of funds,” according to a Raleigh-based panel.
Client Robert Cline, however, received an award for $128,000 in October for damages, costs and attorney fees, with King held “solely liable” for the payouts. Weeks later, client Kathy Walters got an award for $129,000 for damages, interests and costs, though King and the firm are “jointly” liable.
King “encouraged [Cline] to retire early and promised inflated rate of return,” according to the allegations listed about the case on BrokerCheck. Commonwealth denied both the clients’ allegations, and the awards fell far below their combined base-level requests of nearly $1.1 million.
Arbitrators rejected the 2007 claims of a client who accused King of unearned commissions, according to BrokerCheck. Another panel severed a January 2017 claim seeking $2.25 million and required the counsel to file new cases for other clients. King’s most recent disclosure is a pending claim for $640,000.
The firm recognized King as a “business experience” advisor in the top 49% of its reps in 2017, according to his practice’s website. In its nearly 40-year history, Commonwealth has “never taken, or maintained affiliation with, a broker on heightened supervision,” Managing Principal John Rooney said in an emailed statement earlier this year.
“Between the resources heightened supervision requires and the risk/reward of the advisor, we’ve never once considered an exception to that policy,” Rooney said. “Commonwealth would prefer slower growth over a compromised community.”
The self-regulatory organization cited the firm for “extraordinary cooperation” in the mutual fund case, such as starting an internal investigation before FINRA’s probe. Hundreds of clients eligible for discounts had paid front-end or back-end sales charges or higher fees and expenses, according to the settlement.
Share-class cases “really do stem from conflict of interest issues,” Lazaro says. “The broker and the brokerage firm are going to get paid less, depending on the share-class chosen and whether or not the breakpoints are utilized appropriately.”
Commonwealth neither admitted nor denied the allegations as part of the settlement, which placed them in an expanding group of peers: The SEC and FINRA have sanctioned more than 50 firms over allegations relating to mutual-fund share classes in the past five years.
The SEC launched a program earlier this year allowing RIAs to self-report and disgorge 12b-1 fees paid by advisory clients while charging 15 companies with disclosure failures, its latest annual enforcement report says. The agency has nearly a dozen open investigations of other firms, according to the report.
FINRA is still working on what it calls its mutual fund waiver sweep aimed at cases like Commonwealth’s. Spokeswoman Michelle Ong stated in August 2017 that 35 firms had paid nearly $80 million in restitution since 2015, though she said no more updated figures were immediately available this week.