The SEC's green light for dozens of investment firms to offer ETF share classes of traditional mutual funds has opened new avenues for active vehicles built in the tax-efficient structure.
Even before the Securities and Exchange Commission approved the so-called dual share classes for 30 fund companies — including BlackRock, JPMorgan Chase, Fidelity Investments, State Street and Morgan Stanley last month and
But that
"I explain that they're similar to mutual funds, they just trade throughout the day," Helveston said. "I don't get questions beyond that, really."
READ MORE:
Fund companies ready to launch
However, fund companies expect clients
"ETF share classes can be a client service in helping investors transition to a lower-cost, more tax-efficient structure," according to
That could bring further momentum into active ETF products, which surpassed their passive counterparts in fund volume
And it may take time for the dual share classes to make in-roads with advisors, given the fact that Vanguard's patent expired nearly three years ago and competitors couldn't secure their SEC approvals until recent months.
"While more than 80 managers have filed for dual-share-class [products], wealth management home offices have raised concerns about the challenges in supporting such solutions, suggesting slower adoption beyond registered investment advisors," Cerulli's report said. "Cerulli believes that operational challenges and the risk of disrupting relationships with home offices can slow down the rollout, which will in the long term allow managers to offer more tax-efficient [products]."
Regardless, new active ETFs are flooding into the market, to the tune of nearly 1,000 launches last year, according to
"To put that in perspective, only roughly 150 passive ETFs were launched in 2025, bringing the total of U.S.-domiciled passive ETFs to about 3,500," Stephen Welch, a senior manager research analyst for equity strategies, wrote in the note. "Meanwhile, just 95 traditional mutual funds launched last year. Active ETFs still have a long way to go to catch mutual funds, of which there are more than 6,300 U.S. listed strategies, but when it comes to new launches, active ETFs are asset managers' vehicle of choice now."
READ MORE:
Questions on dual share classes for the future
Industry experts will be watching closely to see how the dual share classes could affect investors' behavior in coming years. Some active managers may balk at offering ETF classes of their traditional funds, since they frequently "protect their edge by closing their doors to new money as they get bigger" and they may not want to "pull back the curtain on their secret sauce" by disclosing their holdings every day, according to
Furthermore, the dual share classes pose the risk of hitting ETF investors
"Many operational challenges remain for widespread adoption of ETF share classes, and how the ETF ecosystem will adapt to an influx of ETF share classes remains to be seen," Sotiroff and Armour wrote. "Dimensional is already the largest provider of active ETFs in the U.S., so adding share classes should be an extension of its existing capabilities. But there are some unknowns. New providers will still have to develop their ETF management capabilities, and an uptick in new ETF launches could put additional stress on market makers. Furthermore, it's unclear how some of the specialized trades that keep ETFs tax-efficient will be funded. ETF share classes are poised to give investors new options and, in some cases, better capabilities. But investors should understand if there's a clear benefit from a dual-class structure before jumping in headfirst."





