The active category still attracting investors, against expectations

Though the shift from active to passive is clear, one category continues to attract investors against expectations: low-priced active funds.

Actively managed funds noted by Morningstar as the cheapest 20% saw $41 billion in inflows over the last two years. Active funds as a whole saw $586 billion in outflows in the same period.

vanguard-real-estate-logo
Suitable for use in public relations materials
Lisa J Godfrey

"You would think it's active versus passive, but investors are looking for low-cost investing that could be found in the passive space and found in the active space," says Patricia Oey, senior manager research analyst at Morningstar.

As new money continued to flow into lower-cost index mutual funds, ETFs and institutional share classes in 2016, investors paid less in fund expenses than ever before, according to Morningstar's latest U.S. fund fee study.

The fund industry's most expensive active funds reported outflows, while the cheapest 20% reported $41 billion in inflows over the last two years, according to Morningstar.

The report examined the research firm's data which includes 217,000 open-end mutual funds, 11,600 closed-end funds and 14,100 exchange-traded product listings, as of March 31, 2017.

"We wanted to highlight that active funds are still gathering assets because they are well-priced and they have good managers," Oey said. "We wanted to make that clear, as opposed to always defining it active versus passive."

The asset-weighted average net expense ratio of all U.S. funds was 0.57% in 2016, down from 0.61% in 2015 and 0.65% three years ago; declines largely driven by flows into passive funds and less-expensive share classes, according to Morningstar.

There has been a faster drop in the passive fees paid versus active fees from 2013 to 2016, according to Morningstar.

The average expense ratio of the largest 2,000 funds of 2013, which made up for 85% of assets in mutual funds and ETFs at the time, was 0.72% in 2016, virtually unchanged from 2015 and 2014, Morningstar said.

Cover_slide_051617

When markets are high, everyone feels like genius, but they still have to pay expenses. Help clients keep them low.

1 Min Read

ETFs saw asset-weighted average fees decline from 0.29% in 2013 to 0.24% in 2016. So, while fees are remaining generally static, a majority of the declines are coming from a migration to lower-cost products, Oey says.

U.S. equities saw the biggest fee declines between 2013 and 2016, according to Morningstar.

"The adviser industry is moving toward a fee-based structure. We have to look at the overall cost the investors are paying," she says.

"If investors are moving toward advisers that have asset-based fee structures, then they pay for the funds — but they are also paying for the advisers' fees on top of that,” adds Oey. “The total cost needs to be evaluated."

Vanguard’s asset-weighted average fees fell 21% over the last three years, the most among the 10 largest fund providers.

Vanguard currently has the lowest asset-weighted average expense ratio at 0.11%, followed by SPDR State Street Global Advisors at 0.19% and Dimensional Fund Advisors at 0.36%, according to Morningstar.

The firm's asset-weighted average fees declined 21% over the last three years, the most significant decline among the 10 largest fund providers.

Take Vanguard out of the mix and the overall average expense ratio decline would have been 0.69% to 0.62%.

"Active is not dead," Oey stressed. "People are still investing in active funds that are reasonably priced and their performance is good."

For reprint and licensing requests for this article, click here.
Active management ETFs ETPs Fee disclosures Morningstar State Street Vanguard Money Management Executive
MORE FROM FINANCIAL PLANNING